Howdy, wow, hasn't this thread been enlightening!
First - we support Frank, the OutdoorX4 team and everyone that has contributed to writing/building a truly unique magazine. Regardless of the time spent behind your keyboard expressing your thoughts; there will continue to be readers that appreciate the production efforts, content and print quality of OutdoorX4.
Second - Let me sum it up; thanks for watching! We film what we enjoy. We film what we appreciate. And we film because we want to encourage responsible adventure AND living. To keep it simple - if you want to see a documentary about poverty, drug abuse and tooth loss; you're gonna have to find another YouTube channel to subscribe to cause that ain't us my friend.
As a side note, each of us were raised in the Appalachian Mountains, we live here today and the greater majority of us are graduates from the Mountain State. We advocate responsible living because we care about our childrens' future and we value the natural resources that support our families.
Third - If you don't like the coffee drip; cheers and thanks for looking.
Enlightened by critical review? Hardly.
Let's get one thing straight first and stop obfuscating criticism of MSO, which brought you here to contribute to this post, other than posting advertisements updating your blog. That is an entirely separate issue so please, cease referencing OutdoorX4 immediately. There has been nothing but civil discussion and consistent respect for Frank's publication and James contribution to this last issue. Frank and James demostrated their mettle by accepting challenge and courteously and thoroughly responding to my and other posts.
A separate post directed to Frank about an advertiser, MSO, was critical of their representation of Appalachia and genuineness of their motivations. Completely separate from the earlier observations. All you Team MSO - not the publication or its' editor.
Appalachia extends from Maine to Georgia with considerable breadth along the range - West Virginia doesn't have a lock on it, and neither does MSO. There is much to report and explore in that region and it's not all disease, disability, or misfortune. I find it objectionable that you raise stereotypical derogatory images of Appalachia as if to accuse our viewers that they demand to see deformity, pain, and suffering.
The larger question you chose to ignore is what has MSO done to contribute to those communities? Wrapping yourselves in the mantle of, "we care about our childrens' future and we value the natural resources that support our families," won't cut it with this group. What have you done to benefit the communities you've visited besides film, interview, and pay for fuel? Simple guy talk - you talk the talk, but do you walk the walk?
Is it information and images that you record from your travels while demonstrating vendors products along the way? Is it marketing the routes your adventures were performed on - those state and county public roads, or are these exclusive trails and properties you have leased and are paying the owners for access? Perhaps its recording the images and describing the products donated, or offered at reduced prices unavailable to the public by sponsors you're developing as you build up your personal vehicles? I just don't see how you're
protecting anything when it's under the guise of marketing or acquiring new products for your use. More has to go into the community than what you plow back into your trips, photography and video equipment, and your personal vehicles.
As you know - I brought it up - I don't care for your coffee stand. I think it's wasteful, and your mark-up shameful, especially since that drip coffee maker is designed to sit on the bloody cup in the first place. Made in West Virginia by who? Jeremy, Jason, or Jamie of Team MSO; perhaps another deserving population or business that would appreciate the extra work and keep employees active vice looking for work? However, tell me that the profits for the hoodie, routes, bumper sticker, drip stand, and coozies advertising MSO will go back to a verifiable charity, advocacy, or civic group based in West Virginia and I might re-consider my harsh criticism.
Enlightened? Your reply indicates a complete absence of illumination demonstrated by obfuscation, and your avoidance and trivialization of Haggis's remarks, which in turn only heightens my and others suspicions of your motives as mercenary and less than supportive of the communities you claim to protect.