This came right after Tango's post about MSO's response. I believe MSO responded adequately, and respectfully. The word Really in italics ????. Picture of the Instagram with the hashtag stuff??? They said their piece, don't say you accept the explanation and then proceed to chastise and rip it apart, it makes for hollow words.
Matt
Matt - thanks for your comments and I'll explain them for all to ponder. I completely agree that Jason responded in a courteous fashion and I sincerely believe I did too. The italicized word
really was used purposefully and is an acceptable use in composition to underscore the importance of the word. It was italicized to emphasize that although MSO is a member of the forum the bulk of their content only serves to introduce their video productions. They have received several cautions from Dave and others of us that bloggers content must be more than an introduction and a link to their most recent adventure and blog. That's clearly established in our forum rules and has been for quite a while. Some agree to follow those guidelines and have adjusted their content because they
get it - they are interested in the development of this community and likewise embrace our shared goals. Others don't and have since moved on, or worse, persist in flaunting the rule. When that is done, it's a pretty clear indication that the intent is self-promotion and not in the interest of growing this community.
I believe you've taken out of context the Instagram snapshot. You recall the preceding paragraph discussed "perception is reality," and the utilization of social media. The Instagram post was included because it clearly indicated the intended audience - all manufacturers of equipment MSO has been soliciting for sponsorship, which is no secret. Any observer would conclude the same thing or potentially worse - pandering at the expense of those they purport to represent, or exploitation. Certainly a moniker that MSO has to be very cautious of.
In your final sentence Matt you claim my acceptance of Jason's explanation was hollow as I proceeded to, "chastise and rip it apart." Well, you are dead-wrong Matt. Accepting their explanation
without feedback based on specific examples would truly be hollow. Worse, it would be disingenuous... I'll even go so far as to say
cowardly. Let me give you an example from that original post... you'll note my comments were for all to see, nothing behind closed doors -- and I solicited for additional remarks. I also directed my comments towards the individuals responsible for the publication and article, and I did so courteously and with specific rationale or examples. I even included some self-deprecating humor to minimize the impact or my critical review - because you know we just can't say what we mean for fear that others might take it out of context - gratefully the majority of readers got it... you'll see that by the number of references made to my cane or fellow former guests of Holiday Inn Express (including the author of the article I questioned). We concluded our exchange respectfully with the agreement to disagree and the promise of coffee or cocktails next May in Arizona. I genuinely look forward to meeting James and seeing Frank again.
Now, if you take the time to re-read that onerous thread I never mentioned anything about MSO - that concern was voiced by another member - and reasonably so - it was originally in the "Bonfire" section (see forum rules). My response was in fact directed to MSO
after they had responded in what I viewed as a disparaging and objectionable manner - something they had invited on themselves, especially when they deflected criticism of their practices onto OutdoorX4 and deferred to provide details about their questioned activities.
So Matt, I've taken great pains to explain in detail the motivations for my words and actions -- I don't expect you to accept or reject them. From your earlier post in the original thread where you made veiled accusations to members of the staff and non-specific dissatisfaction about your experience at a Rendezvous event, I appreciate that you took the time in this thread to direct your comments to me, directly, and I hope you tell us more about your observations. From the tenor of your two posts I suspect you have more to share.
But I
really feel compelled to bring this to your attention - it's like fingernails slowly drawn across a chalkboard to me... the use of multiple punctuations in a sentence is not done. Ever.
(The Chicago Manual of Style) Except by teenage girls - they do it - a lot!!!