The Random Thoughts Thread

Good question and yes it does. Historically, in modern US history, populations follow economic opportunity. Your state is a perfect example of that... abandoned steel mills, mines, and factories abound in PA; even abandoned towns. Where there has been a turnaround in urban areas of Pittsburg, the revival has been centered on tourism, retail, and healthcare, all volatile industries.

California is already seeing a migration and I suspect it will be enhanced when business finds it can no longer afford the high state and federal taxes, energy, human resource, health-care, and restrictive industrial/manufacturing policies.

Another question to compliment yours - Will there come a day when Americans start moving to different countries based on the availability of water and electricity?

In large numbers, I don't think so, for a few reasons
- most Americans don't have a second language in their bag of tricks, that means change or moving to a small number of Countries.
- I believe that one major failing of the electrical grid would be enough of a wakeup call to finally get State and Federal government to focus on our infrastructure
- I think that most Americans can't imagine another Country having anything better. Now this statement could open up a whole can of worms, which may be why I'm including this. For those that want to dive down this rabbit hole, search YouTube for News Room, why America isn't the greatest Country in the world. I realize the show is fiction, but there are quite a few facts in that monologue that most politicians probably don't want most Americans to really think about.
- At the end of the day, I believe the good ole USA can pull roses out of a manure pile if the right motivations exist.
 
You can hope... but in that future Hobbesian world (read President Hillary Clinton) which spawned the widespread availability of electricity and clean water who's to say not. Transnational migration occurs routinely on the African Continent and parts of Asia driven by natural and man-made disasters.

Who's to say under the right economic and political conditions the US (President Hillary Clinton) could not descend into that level of desperation? Look at Detroit for example... they are a perfect example of a potential US future driven to that point by political and economic forces that influenced the social decline they suffer under today.

I think you'll be surprised at the number of Americans who have already migrated to Canada or Americans who maintain dual citizenship in that country. I was also surprised to learn the number of American expatriates who live overseas where their money goes farther, especially retirement dollars. As things continue to deteriorate, I predict major earners will relocate overseas and perform their jobs remotely. The citizens who will first take advantage of this will probably be the best and brightest too, leaving us with an expanding population of less educated and/or motivated Americans. The cascading effects are predictable.
 
Completely agree that the best and brightest will be the first to go if this happens.

I'm hoping that someone can be found that can communicate the urgency of fiscal responsibility at the State and Federal levels. The repercussions of that should lead us down the path of less government and greater self reliance. The challenge has always been balancing fiscal sanity and social programs to ensure the lowest economic groups don't simply resort to rioting.
 
Interesting...

http://news.yahoo.com/may-coolest-camping-invention-yet-080000228.html

Camping: There’s something very appealing about being surrounded by nature, far from the urban chaos that defines our usual existence. But along with the enjoyable bits — sleeping in the woods or under the stars — come the parts that are a lot less fun: the hours spent packing up gear, the seemingly endless assault by insects that want to feast on your blood, and waking up in a freezing cold (or boiling hot) tent.
Derek O’Sullivan, who grew up camping with his family in Ireland, decided four years ago that he wanted to solve the latter, so he invented the Thermo Tent. It’s just like a standard camping tent, but with one major difference: It’s thermally insulated. “The whole idea is to avoid those spikes in temperature,” O’Sullivan tells OZY. The Thermo Tent is actually two tents in one: the regular tent and a specially designed inner tent made of a three-layer blend of poly-cotton and high-density insulation. The result: a shelter that stays cool when it’s hot outside, or warm when the weather turns cold. And there’s a second benefit too: The insulating layer also cuts down on sound that enters (or escapes) the inner tent — enough to take a loud conversation down to a whisper.
As a former consultant working in the insulation industry, O’Sullivan reckoned that we insulate everything else, so why not tents? “Nobody has done it before,” O’Sullivan claims of his design, adding that even the U.S. military has resorted to less-than-ideal solutions such as applying spray-foam insulation to the outside of their tents when conditions called for extra warmth. In the last two years, his Tralee, Ireland-based company has grown to six people and recently completed a successful $55,000 round of funding on Kickstarter.

View photo
.
9c4f25a5b14366c32bcf29f042e88838

Thermo Tent could make camping even better.
Source: Thermo Tent




There are two Thermo Tent models, which you can buy directly from the company (they ship worldwide): First, there’s the three-person version ($539) that packs into a single bag, suitable for hiking. Then there’s a bit of a jump. For a more luxurious 6-person tent — aimed at the “glamping” end of the market — that packs into two bags, you’ll pay around $1,880. The company also makes a specialized disaster relief model and recently became an official tent supplier to the U.N.
To be sure, the price of the luxury model might be more than a little steep for some. However, Toronto-based former Outward Bound instructor Elizabeth Doyle says that the cost of the three-person version is actually lower than high-end expedition tents, which go for more than $700. The tent’s biggest drawback, in her opinion? “It’s way too heavy for general wilderness travel,” she says. At 26.4 lbs. for the three-person model and a whopping 105 lbs. for the six-person model, they’re hardly light; other options can weigh as little as 5.6 lbs. So maybe not for your annual camping trek into the bush. However, for guided trips with porters, the insulated tents could “make clients feel more pampered,” Doyle suggests.
If your family wants to heed the call of the great outdoors, without the uncomfortable heat and cold that goes with it (not to mention some of those noisy fellow campers), the Thermo Tent might be worth the investment — in both cash and hauling efforts. This may even be the camping upgrade that coaxes those decidedly non-campers from their comfy hotels and into the woods.
 
I didn't think it looked good when I saw it live, couldn't bring myself to watch the replays.
 
Looks like OshKosh won the HumVee replacement contest...

http://news.yahoo.com/oshkosh-build-humvee-replacement-u-military-sources-211430670--finance.html

Osh Kosh raced a couple of these units in the Baja 1000 a few years back. They didn't fair very well. One lost a transmission in the first hundred miles, the other one timed out by a few hours, but did complete the course. Average speed to stay in the time limit for the 1000 is usually around 25 MPH.

One of the race vehicles at contingency before the race.

oshkosh.jpg
[/URL][/IMG]
oshkosh.jpg


To their credit SCORE didn't require a roll cage, the cab structure was deemed satisfactory. (Not that SCORE does any actually engineering tests on anyone's cage)
 
Looks like OshKosh won the HumVee replacement contest...

http://news.yahoo.com/oshkosh-build-humvee-replacement-u-military-sources-211430670--finance.html

Osh Kosh raced a couple of these units in the Baja 1000 a few years back. They didn't fair very well. One lost a transmission in the first hundred miles, the other one timed out by a few hours, but did complete the course. Average speed to stay in the time limit for the 1000 is usually around 25 MPH.

One of the race vehicles at contingency before the race.

oshkosh.jpg
[/URL][/IMG]
oshkosh.jpg


To their credit SCORE didn't require a roll cage, the cab structure was deemed satisfactory. (Not that SCORE does any actually engineering tests on anyone's cage)


I'm wondering how much of the JLTV was kept and how much was tossed aside for the competition. It would've been interesting to see a fully armored, production ready rig compete on the course. Too bad it will never happen with all the security and liability issues.
 
You just can't stop stupid...and once again, closure is considered management for the benefit of said stupid people!

https://www.yahoo.com/tech/s/bear-selfies-force-colorado-park-211703568.html

This article, Bear selfies force a Colorado park to close, originally appeared on CNET.com.

We were warned last year, people. And yet here are we are again. It seems enough of us have been ignoring the common-sense advice to stop taking selfies with large, dangerous wild bears in the background that one popular Denver-area park has taken the serious measure of closing to the public.

"We've actually seen people using selfie sticks to try and get as close to the bears as possible, sometimes within 10 feet of wild bears," Brandon Ransom, manager of recreation for Denver Water, which manages Waterton Canyon recreation area in the foothills outside the city, said in a blog post earlier this month. "The current situation is not conducive for the safety of our visitors or the well-being of the wildlife."

So, park managers closed the canyon to humans until bear activity subsides. On Friday, the closure was extended through the weekend and will remain in place until further notice.



Related stories
According to Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW), it's a particularly bad time of year to go bothering bears preparing to hibernate by trying to get them in the frame for just the right Instagram shot.

I wasn't able to find any selfies specifically from Waterton canyon that have made it on to social media, but here's an example of one from Alaska that certainly doesn't seem to be from a safe distance:


"It is a poor choice from our perspective, A) to get that close to wildlife and B) to turn your back, particularly on bears," Matt Robbins, a spokesman for CPW, told KMGH-TV in Denver.

Come on, people. You're not just putting yourselves at risk, you are officially beginning to ruin it for everyone else.

If you absolutely must have a bear in your selfies, the below video includes some shots that were taken at a safe distance by park managers. Everyone will be much happier if you just photoshop these in your backgrounds instead. The same principle, of course, applies to tigers and bison.
 
I say let nature take its course. Darwinism at its best.

You just can't stop stupid...and once again, closure is considered management for the benefit of said stupid people!

https://www.yahoo.com/tech/s/bear-selfies-force-colorado-park-211703568.html

This article, Bear selfies force a Colorado park to close, originally appeared on CNET.com.

We were warned last year, people. And yet here are we are again. It seems enough of us have been ignoring the common-sense advice to stop taking selfies with large, dangerous wild bears in the background that one popular Denver-area park has taken the serious measure of closing to the public.

"We've actually seen people using selfie sticks to try and get as close to the bears as possible, sometimes within 10 feet of wild bears," Brandon Ransom, manager of recreation for Denver Water, which manages Waterton Canyon recreation area in the foothills outside the city, said in a blog post earlier this month. "The current situation is not conducive for the safety of our visitors or the well-being of the wildlife."

So, park managers closed the canyon to humans until bear activity subsides. On Friday, the closure was extended through the weekend and will remain in place until further notice.



Related stories
According to Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW), it's a particularly bad time of year to go bothering bears preparing to hibernate by trying to get them in the frame for just the right Instagram shot.

I wasn't able to find any selfies specifically from Waterton canyon that have made it on to social media, but here's an example of one from Alaska that certainly doesn't seem to be from a safe distance:


"It is a poor choice from our perspective, A) to get that close to wildlife and B) to turn your back, particularly on bears," Matt Robbins, a spokesman for CPW, told KMGH-TV in Denver.

Come on, people. You're not just putting yourselves at risk, you are officially beginning to ruin it for everyone else.

If you absolutely must have a bear in your selfies, the below video includes some shots that were taken at a safe distance by park managers. Everyone will be much happier if you just photoshop these in your backgrounds instead. The same principle, of course, applies to tigers and bison.
 
I say let nature take its course. Darwinism at its best.

So no one can find a person that got mauled by taking a bear selfie, but they shut down access anyway? Is this another case of I know better than you?

I have another plan. When you pay the entrance fee have them sign a document that states people are forbidden to be within "x" feet of wildlife. On the receipt, have a map to the closest hospital.

We have a phrase at work, "you can't fix stupid". We actually categorize support cases in this category. We track this as we don't want to spend $$$ on stupid. We're happy to spend $$ on developing good processes, training materials, translating into too many languages, and good questions, but stupid, there isn't enough time or money to make that right.
 
So no one can find a person that got mauled by taking a bear selfie, but they shut down access anyway? Is this another case of I know better than you?

I have another plan. When you pay the entrance fee have them sign a document that states people are forbidden to be within "x" feet of wildlife. On the receipt, have a map to the closest hospital.

We have a phrase at work, "you can't fix stupid". We actually categorize support cases in this category. We track this as we don't want to spend $$$ on stupid. We're happy to spend $$ on developing good processes, training materials, translating into too many languages, and good questions, but stupid, there isn't enough time or money to make that right.

It's all about risk management... and anticipatory litigation. Even a waiver doesn't prevent a frivolous lawsuit...

OWW! DAMMIT! I just spilled my coffee!

That really hurt... someone has to pay... where's Saul's number when you need it?
 
Completely agree that the best and brightest will be the first to go if this happens.

I'm hoping that someone can be found that can communicate the urgency of fiscal responsibility at the State and Federal levels. The repercussions of that should lead us down the path of less government and greater self reliance. The challenge has always been balancing fiscal sanity and social programs to ensure the lowest economic groups don't simply resort to rioting.

"best and brightest" My ass, I disagree, I'll be the first to go!:mike
 
Back
Top Bottom